Cross-lingual three-way NLI in 15 languages: given a premise and hypothesis, choose entailment, contradiction, or neutral.
unassessed
| Category | reasoning |
|---|---|
| Subcategory | 15-language three-way textual entailment |
| Page status | active |
| Metric | accuracy |
| Direction | higher_is_better |
| Unit | % |
| Dataset size | 112500 |
| Dataset licence | CC BY-NC 4.0 |
| Publisher | Facebook AI, with New York University |
XNLI tests whether a model can decide, in each of 15 languages, if a premise sentence entails a hypothesis, contradicts it, or neither (neutral). The English pairs come from MultiNLI's development and test genres. Professional translators produced the other 14 languages so the same labels apply across the parallel set. The original use was cross-lingual transfer: train NLI in English, test in another language without target-language NLI labels.
Three-way classification (entailment / neutral / contradiction). lm-evaluation-harness scores multiple-choice log-likelihood over a cloze: premise + ", {right}? {Yes|Also|No}, " + hypothesis, with those cue words translated per language in utils.py. The group `xnli` averages accuracy across 15 language tasks, weighted by size.
No model card in ModelSpec reports this benchmark yet.