OpenSWI

Geophysics inversion set of ~23 million Vs–dispersion pairs; OpenCompass scores two LLM configs named OpenSWI-shallow-1k and OpenSWI-deep-1k with RMSE.

Also known as: OpenSWI-shallow, OpenSWI-deep, OpenSWI-real, openswi_gen

unassessed

This page is a discovery lead. Nobody has yet assessed it against the catalogue contract, so it carries no disposition. Absence of evidence here is not evidence of staleness.
Categorydomain
Subcategorysurface-wave dispersion inversion to 1-D S-wave velocity
Page statusactive
MetricRMSE
Directionlower_is_better
Dataset licenceCC-BY-4.0
PublisherShanghai Jiao Tong University and Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory

What it measures

OpenSWI asks a model to recover a 1-D S-wave velocity (Vs) profile from a fundamental-mode surface-wave dispersion curve. The original dataset is a geophysics benchmark for deep inversion networks, not a reading quiz. OpenCompass wraps two subsets as chat generation: a system prompt names a geophysical inversion expert, the user message is the stored prompt, and the model must emit a Python list of Vs values. Shallow pairs come from OpenFWI 2-D geology (README table 0.1–10 s; Hugging Face and ESSD text 0.2–10 s, depths to about 2.8 km). Deep pairs come from 14 global and regional 3-D models. OpenSWI-real holds observed curves from Long Beach and the China Seismological Reference Model; OpenCompass does not load that split.

Task format

OpenCompass: zero-shot GenInferencer with ZeroRetriever. Configs openswi_gen and openswi_rawprompt_gen differ only in PromptTemplate versus RawPromptTemplate. Both ask for a Python list. OpenSWIMSEEvaluator parses the last bracketed list, pads or trims to the gold length, and reports RMSE plus a validity rate. The paper's own protocol trains a transformer on millions of synthetic pairs and tests on OpenSWI-real, which is a different setup.

Models reporting this benchmark

No model card in ModelSpec reports this benchmark yet.

Data

This page as JSON · Edit on GitHub