CLEAR (MedHELM)

MedHELM three-way classification of whether a clinical note supports, denies, or is uncertain about a patient's history of one of 13 conditions.

Also known as: CLinical Entity Augmented Retrieval, MedHELM CLEAR

unassessed

This page is a discovery lead. Nobody has yet assessed it against the catalogue contract, so it carries no disposition. Absence of evidence here is not evidence of staleness.
Categorydomain
Subcategorythree-way history classification from English clinical notes (MedHELM)
Page statusactive
Metricexact_match
Directionhigher_is_better
Dataset licenceCC BY 4.0 (paper); clinical notes are not a public dump
PublisherStanford University School of Medicine; MedHELM / Stanford CRFM wrap

What it measures

clear is HELM's MedHELM scenario that asks a model to read an English clinical note and decide whether the patient has a history of one named condition. Each condition is a separate run. The thirteen conditions are alcohol dependence, ADHD, bipolar disorder, chronic pain, homelessness, liver disease, major depression, personality disorder, PTSD, substance use disorder, suicidal behavior, tobacco dependence, and unemployment. The paper HELM cites is a retrieval method (CLinical Entity Augmented Retrieval) evaluated on labeled notes; HELM does not run that RAG pipeline. It scores a three-way letter choice on the notes themselves.

Task format

Zero-shot joint multiple choice. HELM instructions name A/B/C for has history, does not, or uncertain. max_train_instances=0 and max_tokens=1 in the run spec. The scenario also embeds the same three options in the input. Private Stanford MedHELM entries cap evaluation at 100 instances per condition and pass a local data_path of per-condition .xlsx files.

Models reporting this benchmark

No model card in ModelSpec reports this benchmark yet.

Data

This page as JSON · Edit on GitHub